To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
This composite reflects aggregation across available major scorecards (Heritage Action, Club for Growth, ACU, LCV, AFL-CIO/CWA labor, pro-life/reproductive, and others from Vote Smart aggregations):
Conservative/fiscal scorecards (Heritage Action lifetime 75%, 117th Congress 87%, 118th 62%; Club for Growth lifetime 71%, with yearly swings from 89-90% in 2021-2022 to 48-62% in 2023-2024; ACU 68% in 2023) indicating inconsistent alignment with limited-government, spending restraint, and free-market priorities. She scores highly on anti-omnibus, energy deregulation, and regulatory relief votes but lower on CRs, debt ceiling deals, and select appropriations.
Environmental scorecard (LCV lifetime 5%, 2024 3%) is near-zero, reflecting opposition to climate regulations and conservation measures typical of Gulf South Republicans.
Labor/progressive scorecards (CWA lifetime ~7%/recent 0%; implied low AFL-CIO and ADA scores) are minimal, while pro-life groups rate her highly for votes against abortion-related amendments.
She is a measurably weak mainstream Republican in a safe district but is categorically worse on pure libertarian or environmental metrics, with notable deviations in recent spending votes.